W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 2005

Re: XMLLiterals and language

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:18:46 +0900
Message-Id: <6.0.0.20.2.20050119161707.026e12d8@localhost>
To: Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <reto@gmuer.ch>, Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, www-international@w3.org

At 15:24 05/01/19, Martin Duerst wrote:
 >At 21:32 05/01/18, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:

 >>real world usage of RSS shows that even properties designed to have a
 >plain-literal value are often used containing encoded XHTML. The widely
 >used RSS mod:content [1] mandates the encoding of XHTML in a plain literal
 >
 >I originally thought about using this module. But now I see that they
 >indeed have used escaping. This is just simply not the way combination
 >of namespaces is supposed to work in XML. And to me personally, I'm
 >sad to say, but it simply looks disgusting. I'm glad to know that at least
 >one feed format, namely Atom, at least allows inline content without
 >escaping.

I'm glad to report that I just found the 'payload' module in
RSS 1.1 (http://inamidst.com/rss1.1/payload) that uses XML
Literals rather than encoding. Great!

Regards,    Martin.

 >>1. http://web.resource.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2005 07:18:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:04 GMT