W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Language Identifier List Criteria

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:29:18 +0000
To: www-international@w3.org, ietf-languages@iana.org
Message-id: <1987416CA83AC7499AC772F92E2DBF7802B8E3CB@LONSMSXM02.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Hi Tex,

You wrote that you are now keeping the stuff in a database.  That 
would enable you to provide both views:

1.  What tags do I need for the language(s) of country/region X?

2.  What tags exist for (derivatives of) language Y?

The answer to Q1, for the PRC, might be: zh, zh-Hans, zh-CN, ...

The answer to Q2, for zh, might be:
-  zh is [useful in/for ...] | [useless]
-  zh-CN is [useful in/for ...] | [useless]
-  zh-Hans [is useful in/for ...] | [useless]
-  etc

Misha


> On another related topic, I am considering for the next version 
> of the table to organize it differently. It strikes me that for 
> my needs, and my intended audience, that it is not as interesting 
> to list languages and noting which regions they are spoken, as to 
> list each of the regions and note the languages used there. If I 
> do that, I do not have to deal with meaningless identifiers and 
> map them to the correct ones to use.
> 
> So I might have:
> 
> region	languages
> JP	ja
> LI	de-CH (maybe others, I don't know.)
> CH	de-CH, it, fr-FR, rm
> US	en-US, es-US
> CA	fr-CA, en-CA, iu
> 
> With this approach, I can suggest something like the most popular 
> choices, not rule out the existence of other languages being used, 
> the lack of de-LI makes a statement about de-LI vs de-CH, without 
> being as explicit about criteria, other than perhaps a combination 
> of popular choices by major software vendors, offical languages, 
> and claims of encyclopedias and the like as to what is spoken 
> where.
> 
> This approach is more helpful to folks like me who are looking to 
> answer what they need to provide. If someone wants to know how 
> many variants of German they need, they can scan the table for all 
> listings of de and de-*, and even scan just the regions they 
> support to determine their perhaps more exact needs.
> 
> It's also easier for me to accept edits of the list from people 
> suggesting that language xx-YY is used in region ZZ, without a lot 
> of vetting effort.
> 
> Would that work for people?
> 
> tex





--------------------------------------------------------------- -
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:29:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:04 GMT