W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Language Identifier List up for comments

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 17:58:39 -0500
To: Mark Davis <mark.davis@jtcsv.com>
Cc: www-international@w3.org, ietf-languages@alvestrand.no
Message-ID: <20041217225839.GC3044@skunk.reutershealth.com>

Mark Davis scripsit:

> And the broader point is that whenever you are saying that xx-YY and xx-ZZ
> have different denotations, you *are* saying that xx differs by country. In
> that case you can't just say that xx-WW is "not recommended", you have to
> say *which* country variant it is the same as.

Not necessarily, especially if you don't know.  Claiming that de-AT, de-DE, and
de-CH are recommended doesn't disrecommend other possibilities; in particular,
there is a fair amount of de-US material out there, especially old newspapers,
but it probably wouldn't make sense to recommend de-US for general use today.

-- 
John Cowan                              jcowan@reutershealth.com
http://www.reutershealth.com            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Humpty Dump Dublin squeaks through his norse
                Humpty Dump Dublin hath a horrible vorse
But for all his kinks English / And his irismanx brogues
                Humpty Dump Dublin's grandada of all rogues.  --Cousin James
Received on Friday, 17 December 2004 22:59:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:04 GMT