- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 17:06:47 -0000
- To: "'Peter Constable'" <petercon@microsoft.com>, "'IETF Languages'" <ietf-languages@iana.org>, <www-international@w3.org>
Yes, I know that, and you know that, but my point is that the table doesn't point up that there's an issue here; much less what the right usage is. RI ============ Richard Ishida W3C contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ W3C Internationalization: http://www.w3.org/International/ Publication blog: http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ > -----Original Message----- > From: www-international-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-international-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Peter Constable > Sent: 16 December 2004 16:49 > To: IETF Languages; www-international@w3.org > Subject: RE: Language Identifier List up for comments > > > > From: ietf-languages-bounces@alvestrand.no [mailto:ietf-languages- > > bounces@alvestrand.no] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida > > > > Btw, what does de-CH represent in the table? Swiss German is > > different from de-DE... > > The ISO 639 ID "de" should not be used for Schwyzerdütsch. > The tag "de-CH" means High German as used in Switzerland. > > > Peter Constable >
Received on Thursday, 16 December 2004 17:06:48 UTC