W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 2004

Re: Language Identifier List up for comments

From: John Burger <john@mitre.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 09:48:56 -0500
Message-Id: <47D6D162-4DDF-11D9-8D26-00039386A8F2@mitre.org>
To: www-international@w3.org, ietf-languages@alvestrand.no

Elizabeth J. Pyatt wrote:

> Do you really need to specify different types of English used in the 
> United States territories (e.g. Puerto Rico, Guam, etc). I'm aware 
> that there are local varieties in some cases, but I'm not sure they 
> are reflected in the WRITTEN forms, just in pronunciation. That is, 
> business English is the same in Puerto Rico as in the continental U.S.

> Theoretically, you could create a pronunciation/syntax engine for 
> en-PR as well as en-TX (Texas), en-NYC (New Yawk City), etc, but I'm 
> not sure how well received it would be as a serious tool.

Machine-generated speech is presumably not the only spoken resource 
that needs language codes.  I can imagine labeling a library of 
recordings of English speakers from lots of places, and thus needing 
all of en-US-PR, en-US-TX and en-US-NY-NewYorkCity.

- John D. Burger
   MITRE
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 14:49:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:04 GMT