Quoting Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>: > > On Tuesday, April 6, 2004, 11:23:43 AM, Frank wrote: > > FE> Mark Davis wrote: > > >> In practice, however, the bytes 0x80..0x9F in iso-8859-1 are > >> so rarely used > > FE> ...they're even illegal in XML 1.0, aren't they ? Therefore... > > The characters at those positions in the UCS are illegal. Bytes with > those values in a given encoding are not illegal. Same thing for that particular encoding. -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txtReceived on Tuesday, 6 April 2004 08:08:54 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 August 2008 18:35:18 GMT