W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > April to June 2003

Re: Can HTTP content-type charset disagree with its contents XML encoding?

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:24:06 +0200
Message-ID: <9359591703.20030430022406@w3.org>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
CC: www-international@w3.org

On Wednesday, April 30, 2003, 1:58:55 AM, Bjoern wrote:

BH> * Chris Lilley wrote:
>>It is in that specification that the precedence is defined (and other
>>unfortunate things, such as a mandatory default of US-ASCII when no
>>charset is provided in the HTTP, regardless of what the XML encoding
>>declaration says).
>>
>>This is very bad. As a member of the TAG I find this very broken,
>>architecturally speaking. Tim Bray agrees, and I have proposed wording
>>in the architecture document that spells this out.

BH> Many (if not most) XML processor toolkits don't even implement the
BH> US-ASCII default for text/plain...

This is also true.

And if someone is handling an xml media type as text/plain, then
encoding is the least of their worries.

-- 
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2003 20:50:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:17:00 GMT