W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: glyph selection for Unicode in browsers

From: by way of Martin Duerst <jshin@mailaps.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 16:00:17 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20020928160012.0408a928@localhost>
To: www-international@w3.org






On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Tex Texin wrote:

 > Jungshik Shin wrote:
 > >
 > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Tex Texin wrote:
 > >
 > > > Yes, OS and browsers are getting better. My concerns center around:
 > > > Is the mechanism for selecting fallback fonts language-sensitive, so
 > > > that it would favor a Japanese font for Unicode Han characters that were
 > > > tagged as lang:ja
 > >
 > >   I'm a little at loss as to why you have the impression
 > > that  'lang' tag has little effect on rendering of html (in
 > > UTF-8. e.g. your page or IUC10 announcement page which used to be at
 > > http://www.unicode.org/iuc/iuc10/x-utf8.html) by major browsers. MS
 > > IE has been making use of 'lang' attribute(html) for a long time and
 > > Mozilla solved the problem (although 'xml:lang' is not yet supported)
 > > last December. In case of Mozilla(and Netscape 7), see


 > I am glad to see the issue has been given some attention.
 > I concluded there was a problem after experimenting with some CJK
 > characters that I repeated with different lang tags and could not get
 > any display differences unless I used non-Unicode fonts assigned to each
 > language. I did this with IE 6 and NS 7 and Opera (dont recall if it was
 > 6 or 7.)

   Actually, you might have had hard time telling the display difference
depending on what characters you used for your testing EVEN IF you
configured browsers to use different (but with __very similar__ design
principles and look/feels) Unicode-cmapped (but NON-pan-script) fonts
for TC,SC, J and K *under MS Windows*.  This difficulty demonstrates
that CJK Unification in Unicode/10646 is not such a big problem as some
people tried to make it.

   Jungshik
Received on Saturday, 28 September 2002 05:43:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:16:59 GMT