- From: Jungshik Shin <jshin@mailaps.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 17:24:25 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Suzanne M. Topping" <stopping@bizwonk.com>
- cc: "Unicode (E-mail)" <unicode@unicode.org>, "Nelocsig (E-mail)" <nelocsig@yahoogroups.com>, "I18N (E-mail)" <i18n-prog@yahoogroups.com>, "Www-International (E-mail)" <www-international@w3.org>
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Jungshik Shin wrote: > On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Suzanne M. Topping wrote: > > > The two examples I dug out of various ongoing email debates etc. are > up at http://140.111.1.40 (Chinese character variant dictionary compiled ... > hold up. As Thomas Chan once remarked on this list, Japanese objection to > CJK unification would have been much smaller if more canonical > glyphs (as listed in the aforementioned variant dictionary) have been > used in TUS 3.0 table. Compare the canonical glyph and variants given for U+76F4 at http://140.111.1.40/yitia/fra/fra02759.htm with glyphs in TUS 3.0 p. 677 and p. 886. Jungshik Shin
Received on Friday, 21 December 2001 17:25:33 UTC