- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:02:35 +0100
- To: www-international@w3.org
- Cc: unicode@unicode.org, Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh@sharif.edu>
This mail, addressed to <www-i18n@w3.org>, was, presumably, intended
for <www-international@w3.org>.
Misha
On 15/05/2001 00:32:24 Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> Well, I received a UTF-8 email from Microsoft's Dr International today. It
> was a "multipart/alternative", with both the "text/plain" and "text/html"
> in UTF-8. Well, nothing interesting yet, but the interesting point was
> that the HTML version had a UTF-8 signature, but the text version lacked
> it. So, the HTML version had it three times: mime charset as UTF-8,
> UTF-8 signature, and <meta> charset markup.
>
> Questions:
>
> 1. What are the current recommendations for these?
>
> 2. Most important of all, does W3C allow UTF-8 signatures before
> "<!DOCTYPE>"? And if yes, what should be done if they mismatch the
> charset as can be described in the <meta> tag?
>
> --roozbeh
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 11:21:19 UTC