At 15:12 21.10.98 +0100, Carrasco Benitez Manuel wrote: >In RFC 1766, the first characters does not seems to denote a >language or family of languages. Namely > > i- for IANA > x- for experimental > >Again, the syntax is secondary and this could be indicated in another >way. > what I don't like about t-el-latin is that it loses the basic information that this is in fact Greek; it won't match an "accept-language: el". i- and x- are "escape hatches". Harald -- Harald Tveit Alvestrand, Maxware, Norway Harald.Alvestrand@maxware.noReceived on Friday, 23 October 1998 02:41:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:16:53 GMT