On Wed, 5 Feb 1997, Misha Wolf wrote: > Rob Pike wrote: > >I believe what you're supposed > >to say is charset=UNICODE-1-1-UTF-8. > > Both MS and NS have recently moved to "UTF-8". Rob - Maybe you are assuming that UTF-8 is a general method to encode 4-byte quantities. This is not the case. UTF stands for UCS transfer (or transform or whatever) format. And UCS is the Universal Character Set, aka UNicode/ISO 10646. Also please note that RFC 2044 defines the "charset" tag UTF-8. However, there is one problem in that draft (due to the slow RFC process last year), namely that RFC 2044 is written relative to Unicode 1.1, whereas everyone agrees that "UTF-8" indeed should be used for Unicode 2.0 and upwards. Regards, Martin.Received on Thursday, 6 February 1997 06:26:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:16:46 GMT