- From: Michael Everson <everson@indigo.ie>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 1997 14:42:12 +0100
- To: ietf-languages@uninett.no
- Cc: ietf-languages@uninett.no, ietf-types@uninett.no, www-international@www10.w3.org, iso10646@listproc.hcf.jhu.edu
At 08:44 -0500 1997-01-20, Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no wrote: >- There's a meeting in July of 1997 to resolve the comments > (ISOspeak for revising the draft in light of ballot comments) Where is that meant to be? >My opinion is that we should not revise RFC 1766, "Tags for the identification >of languages", the basis for the Content-language: header, to refer to this >work until the final resolution of comments is done, and the document is >published as an ISO standard. I agree. >And then, if there are still 2 columns, RFC 1766 should refer to only >ONE of them. I agree; and it should refer to the Terminology one. >*Gaelic (Scots) gae gdh Recte Gaelic, Scottish (= Gàidhlig na h-Alba) >*Irish iri gai Recte Gaelic, Irish (= Gaeilge na hÉireann) Note that gae and gai are hopelessly confusing, considering the native terminology. We have been discussing a resolution to this (gla, gle as Terminology terms) with the editors of the standard. -- Michael Everson, Everson Gunn Teoranta 15 Port Chaeimhghein Íochtarach; Baile Átha Cliath 2; Éire (Ireland) Gutháin: +353 1 478-2597, +353 1 283-9396 http://www.indigo.ie/egt 27 Páirc an Fhéithlinn; Baile an Bhóthair; Co. Átha Cliath; Éire
Received on Monday, 20 January 1997 09:41:42 UTC