W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > January to March 1997

Re: Translations

From: Koen Holtman <koen@win.tue.nl>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 13:33:57 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <199701151233.NAA02527@wsooti08.win.tue.nl>
To: carrasco@innet.lu (M.T. Carrasco Benitez)
Cc: www-international@www10.w3.org
M.T. Carrasco Benitez:
[...HTTP accept-language header...]
>I agree: it is just the semantic of q; there has been talks in this 
>list and before this list.
>"q" should be used for *one* of the following:
> - Quality of the linguistic version
> - Ordered preference list of languages

Quoting the HTTP/1.1 specification:

|Each language-range MAY be given an associated quality value which
|represents an estimate of the user's preference for the languages
|specified by that range.

so the q gives the preference of the user.  HTTP/1.1 does not assign any
meaning to the order in which the languages are listed in the header, the
preference ranking is completely determined by the q factors.


Received on Wednesday, 15 January 1997 07:38:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:16 UTC