>> I propose that HTML be modified so that the very special construct: >> <INPUT TYPE=hidden NAME=charset> >> i.e., a form with a hidden field with the field name "charset" be >> interpreted as "supply the charset used for encoding the values". > >If HTML could be changed, perhaps an attribute on the FORM would >make more sense? I am probably responsible for this. In Seville I showed the kinds of problem we have with DynaWeb, and suggested that you could use a "hidden" field to indicate encoding, and look at the actual values as just strings of bytes: /foo?charset=SHIFT-JIS;value1=%83%54%83%8f%81%5b%83%4e%83%8a%81%5b%83%80 as a hack. The browser would supply the "charset=XXXX" part automagically.Received on Friday, 6 December 1996 18:11:44 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 19:16:46 GMT