W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-international@w3.org > October to December 1996

Clarification of discussion

From: Andrea Vine [CONTRACTOR] <avine@dakota-76.Eng.Sun.COM>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 13:26:09 -0700
Message-Id: <199610242026.NAA02651@gongolo.eng.sun.com>
To: www-international@w3.org
Cc: avine@dakota-76.Eng.Sun.COM
I am trying to follow this discussion as it pertains to the original question (which I've long since deleted, due to space considerations).

Am I to understand that from what Keld, Martin, and Jonathan are saying, you cannot "have your universal CLASS and name it too?"  (This is a play on an English expression, sorry for those not familiar.)  What I mean is, it sounds to me that in order to have a universal CLASS name/definition/type/whatever the original question was, it would have to be constrained to Latin-1 characters with no inscripts, subscripts, or superscripts, glyphically speaking.  The characters must have unambiguous Unicode/10646 representations.

If the CLASS name/definition/type/thing is named using anything other than these characters, then the implementation would be locale and language specific.

Or have I misunderstood?

Andrea Vine
Software internationalization and localization consultant

Rapidly decomposing in the muck and mire of standards discussion...
Received on Thursday, 24 October 1996 16:19:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 21 September 2016 22:37:16 UTC