W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > July 2006

[Comment on ITS WD] Make the application of legacy ruby clearer

From: <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:33:56 +0000
To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-Id: <20060711193356.5D8764F519@homer.w3.org>

Comment from the i18n review of:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/

Comment 36
At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/
Editorial/substantive: E
Owner: RI

Location in reviewed document:
6.6.3

Comment: 
It is very poorly explained what the difference is between this and the situation described in the last para of 6.6.2.


How about:


"Where legacy formats do no contain ruby markup conformant to [Ruby-TR], it is still possible to associate ruby text with a specified range of document content using the rubyRule element."


Note also s/and there one wants/and where one wants/
Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:34:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:36 GMT