Comment from the i18n review of: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-20060518/ Comment 34 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ Editorial/substantive: E Owner: RI Location in reviewed document: 6.6.2 Comment: Although it may be useful to show that ruby content doesn't have to be Japanese, I think it would be more useful and improve the international feel of the spec, to use a Japanese example. We can provide one if needed.Received on Tuesday, 11 July 2006 19:33:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:05:34 GMT