W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > April 2006

Re: Comment on LTLI WD: purpose?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:08:17 +0200
To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.s8imv30r64w2qv@id-c0020.lan>

On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:59:56 +0200, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote:
>> Wasn't BCP 47 going to be 3066bis? (I was talking about the revised BCP
>> 47, sorry for being unclear.)
>
> no problem. Yes, BCP 47 will be 3066bis. But still: 3066bis is not meant
> for *locale* identification, although it will have a relation to it. The
> example in http://www.w3.org/TR/ltli/#lang-locale-values might make the
> difference between language and locale clearer:
>
> [...]

Ah, this makes it more clear. Makes sense, although I'm unsure about  
having a whole specification just to tell people not to extract all kinds  
of local information out of language tags...


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 14:08:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:35 GMT