- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:08:17 +0200
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:59:56 +0200, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: >> Wasn't BCP 47 going to be 3066bis? (I was talking about the revised BCP >> 47, sorry for being unclear.) > > no problem. Yes, BCP 47 will be 3066bis. But still: 3066bis is not meant > for *locale* identification, although it will have a relation to it. The > example in http://www.w3.org/TR/ltli/#lang-locale-values might make the > difference between language and locale clearer: > > [...] Ah, this makes it more clear. Makes sense, although I'm unsure about having a whole specification just to tell people not to extract all kinds of local information out of language tags... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 14:08:26 UTC