On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 13:59:56 +0200, Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org> wrote: >> Wasn't BCP 47 going to be 3066bis? (I was talking about the revised BCP >> 47, sorry for being unclear.) > > no problem. Yes, BCP 47 will be 3066bis. But still: 3066bis is not meant > for *locale* identification, although it will have a relation to it. The > example in http://www.w3.org/TR/ltli/#lang-locale-values might make the > difference between language and locale clearer: > > [...] Ah, this makes it more clear. Makes sense, although I'm unsure about having a whole specification just to tell people not to extract all kinds of local information out of language tags... -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 14:08:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:35 GMT