W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > February 2005

Re: Comments on Charmod PR publications

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 16:48:10 +0100
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org, w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org (I18N IG, for archiving only), member-i18n-core@w3.org
Message-ID: <420f6fd7.141097468@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Martin Duerst wrote:
>The explanatory language indeed still mentions "iso-8859-1". This is
>because the most frequent abuse of this kind is (or hopefully, was)
>to create a font where the glyphs used to render the characters in
>the high half of iso-8859-1 were replaced by glyphs from another
>script (e.g. Cyrillic or Thai), and a corresponding Web page was
>labeled as being in iso-8859-1 with an instruction for the reader
>to install the specil font.

You seem to imply that "iso-8859-1" is a coded character set. I do not
think Charmod should use "iso-8859-1" to mean anything but a character
encoding scheme--the term is introduced as a mapping of code points to
bytes and font technology is not typically based on character encoding
schems; I thus stand by my objection to this text as it confuses the
issue.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Monday, 7 February 2005 15:48:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:35 GMT