- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:51:16 +0200
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, www-i18n-comments@w3.org
* Richard Ishida wrote: >LC076 >http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2004/charmod1-lc/SortByOriginator.html#LC076 >Decision: Partially-accepted You are correct that C068 and C069 do >strictly speaking not belong into the PUA section, but they are in >that section because they have a very strong connection to the other >things in that section. This does not satisfy me, I do not see such a "very strong connection", the section is about "Private use code points" and should thus only discuss "Private use code points". >>>>>>>>> C076 [C] Content MUST NOT use a code point for any purpose >other than that defined by its character encoding. > >This prohibits the construction of fonts that misuse e.g. iso-8859-1 >to represent different scripts, characters, or symbols than what is >actually encoded in iso-8859-1. >>>>>>>> It seems you want so talk about "coded character sets" not "character encodings", if not this new text does not make much sense to me. I can live with removing C069.
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:52:00 UTC