W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > October 2004

FW: Your comments on Character Model Fundamentals [LC067, LC069]

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:39:29 +0100
To: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20041021133928.6A8194F1B6@homer.w3.org>

From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] 
Sent: 12 October 2004 15:54
To: Richard Ishida
Subject: Re: Your comments on Character Model Fundamentals [LC067, LC069]

Le 07 oct. 2004, à 05:18, Richard Ishida a écrit :
> properties, or so. Then if that spec is updated, the generic reference 
> can be updated to the latest version of Unicode without problems, but

I like your positivism ;)
But it has been shown... that making generic references are indeed a problem
for conformance.

For example,

	FooML 1.0 makes references to BarML, because it's using it.

BarML in the mean time goes from BarML 1.0 to BarML 2.0 and they change a
few things.

	FooML 1.0 has a broken conformance because the modification of BarML
2.0 makes it impossible to implement it in FooML 1.0.

But if you feel comfortable. Agreed.

Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 13:39:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:15 UTC