- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 01:15:18 +0100
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Hello www-i18n-comments@w3.org, > PLEASE REVIEW the decisions for the following additional comments and reply > to us within the next two weeks at mailto:www-i18n-comments@w3.org (copying > w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org) to say whether you are satisfied with the decision > taken. The TAG resolved to pushback on the grounds of misunderstanding. I18N WG seem to have missed the point we were making, or we were not clear enough. We were concerned about implementations *only* providing visual presentation and visual ordering, while the I18N WG seemed to take the comments as requiring only logical selection. This is not the case. It seems that we all agree that implementations should provide logical selection; and charmod asks for visual selection as well, assuming a logical backing store. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 19:16:37 UTC