W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > February 2004

TAG response to C178 Units of visual rendering

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 01:15:18 +0100
Message-ID: <1675218941.20040207011518@w3.org>
To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
Cc: w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org

Hello www-i18n-comments@w3.org,

> PLEASE REVIEW the decisions for the following additional comments and reply
> to us within the next two weeks at mailto:www-i18n-comments@w3.org (copying
> w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org) to say whether you are satisfied with the decision
> taken.

The TAG resolved to pushback on the grounds of misunderstanding. I18N
WG seem to have missed the point we were making, or we were not clear
enough.

We were concerned about implementations *only* providing visual
presentation and visual ordering, while the I18N WG seemed to take the
comments as requiring only logical selection. This is not the case.

It seems that we all agree that implementations should provide logical
selection; and charmod asks for visual selection as well, assuming a
logical backing store.

-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Friday, 6 February 2004 19:16:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:19:00 UTC