W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > December 2003

Your comments on the Character Model [C018]

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:46:19 -0000
To: <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000301c3c00e$afa6b880$6501a8c0@w3c40upc3ma3j2>

Dear Dan,

Many thanks for your comment on the 2nd Last Call version of the
Character Model for the World Wide Web v1.0 [1].  We appreciate the
interest you have taken in this specification.

You can see the comment you submitted at 
http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2002/charmod-lc/SortByOriginator.h
tml#C018
(You can jump to a specific comment in the table by adding its ID to the
end of the URI.)

PLEASE REVIEW the decision for the following comment and reply to us
within the next two weeks at mailto:www-i18n-comments@w3.org (copying
w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org) to say whether you are satisfied with the decision
taken. 
        C018

Information relating to this comment is included below.

You can find the latest version of the Character Model at
http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-edit/ . 

Best regards,
Richard Ishida, on behalf of Martin Dürst, for the I18N WG




DECISIONS REQUIRING A RESPONSE
==============================

*****C018
   P MD [369]4.4 Example unclear
     * Comment (received 2002-04-30) -- [371]split/concat example looks
       good, I think (LCI-191)
       I'm not quite sure I understand it... maybe it's just my
browser's
       poor rendering... but that string, 'cz', just looks like a normal
       ASCII string. I don't see how the accent thingy pops up when you
       delete the 'z'.
     * Decision: Not applicable.
       Rationale: We have classified this as 'not applicable' because
you
       have not asked for any actual changes of the document. Your
       problem with understanding the cz example may have been due to
       rendering issues, but we doubt that, because the (non-combining)
       cedilla that we used in the draft to represent the combining
       cedilla is part of iso-8859-1, which was rendered well since the
       very first browsers. We suspect that you may have overlooked the
       cedilla, a little low hook after the z. We will try to take your
       suggestion for a test into consideration for our next phase.

    [369]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-NormalizationApplicat
ion
    [371]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2002Apr/0015.html



USEFUL LINKS
==============
[1] The version of CharMod you commented on: 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/
[2] Latest editor's version (still being edited): 
http://www.w3.org/International/Group/charmod-edit/
[3] Last Call comments table, sorted by ID: 
http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2002/charmod-lc/
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 12:46:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:32:34 GMT