W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-i18n-comments@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Please clarify XSL WG comment (issue 146) on Character Model WD

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2002 17:14:42 +0900
Message-Id: <>
To: "Mark Scardina" <mark.scardina@oracle.com>
Cc: "'Sharon Adler'" <sca@us.ibm.com>, <www-i18n-comments@w3.org>, <w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org>

Hello Mark,

Many thanks for your email. We are looking forward to replies
from your group after your upcomming teleconference.

Please note that we have asked you for clarification on three
of your comments:

1) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Aug/0044.html

2) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Aug/0045.html

3) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2002Jul/0088.html

For 3), we asked for clarification on one part of your comment.
Actually, we would like you to clarify both sentences.
There was some followup discussion on 3), but this didn't really
clarify the comment itself. If you think that you need to make
another comment, please check the comments you have already made,
and if you think there is something missing, please submit
another comment asap.

Regards,    Martin.

At 10:38 02/08/27 -0700, Mark Scardina wrote:
>Martin, the XSL WG is on hiatus until Sept.  I will ask Sharon to
>addthis is added to the agenda of our first telcon on 9/5.
>Mark V. Scardina              Group Product Mgr & XML Evangelist
>CORE & XML DEVELOPMENT GROUP  E-mail: Mark.Scardina@oracle.com
>Web Site: http://otn.oracle.com/tech/xml/
>|-----Original Message-----
>|From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@w3.org]
>|Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 12:28 AM
>|To: mark.scardina@oracle.com
>|Cc: www-i18n-comments@w3.org; w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org
>|Subject: Please clarify XSL WG comment (issue 146) on
>|Character Model WD
>|Hello Mark, dear XSL WG,
>|The I18N WG has made quite some progress on a lot of the
>|issues raised in the 2nd last call of the Character Model.
>|However, we still have a few open issues; we hope to be done
>|with them very soon.
>|One of them is:
>|where we would like to get your help.
>|Our entry currently says:
>| >>>>
>|XSL WG Comments on Character Model WD
>|     * Comment (received 2002-06-28) -- XSL WG Comments on
>|Chairacter Model WD
>|       "[S] Specifications of text-based languages and
>|protocols SHOULD define
>|        precisely the construct boundaries necessary to obtain
>|a complete
>|        of full-normalization. These definitions MUST include
>|at least the
>|        between markup and character data as well as entity
>|boundaries (if the
>|        language has any include mechanism) and SHOULD include
>|any other
>|        that may create denormalization when instances of the
>|language are
>|       The requirement (still in 4.4) about defining construct
>|is very
>|       unclear when applied to a language that performs dynamic
>|manipulation of strings.
>|     * [MD will write to ask what is unclear]
>| >>>>
>|Can you please expand on your comment and tell us in more
>|detail what you find unclear, or how you think it could become clearer?
>|Many thanks in advance for a timely response.
>|Regards,     Martin.
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 05:03:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:20:14 UTC