- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 10:40 +0900
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
- Cc: cmsmcq@acm.org (C. M. Sperberg-McQueen)
This is a last call comment from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org) on
the Character Model for the World Wide Web 1.0
(http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/).
Semi-structured version of the comment:
Submitted by: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (cmsmcq@acm.org)
Submitted on behalf of (maybe empty):
Comment type: substantive
Chapter/section the comment applies to: 3.1.5 Units of collation
The comment will be visible to: public
Comment title: User control of collation, foreign matter
Comment:
Thank you for specifying that "[S] [I] Software that allows users to
sort or search text SHOULD allow the user to select alternative rules
for collation units and ordering." I am glad to see that you are not
requiring that software use the collation rules of the user's language
whether the user wants it to or not.
The requirement "[S] [I] When sorting and searching in the context of
a particular language, it MUST be possible to deal gracefully with
strings being compared that contain Unicode characters not normally
associated with that language" appears to be unenforceably vague: the
word "gracefully" seems impossible to define sharply enough to allow
objective determinations of whether a given spec or implementation
conforms with this requirement or not. I would be loath to lose
the word "gracefully" from the text, but I don't believe it belongs in
a conformance requirement.
Structured version of the comment:
<lc-comment
visibility="public" status="pending"
decision="pending" impact="substantive">
<originator email="cmsmcq@acm.org" represents="-"
>C. M. Sperberg-McQueen</originator>
<charmod-section href='http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-charmod-20020430/#sec-CollationUnits'
>3.1.5</charmod-section>
<title>User control of collation, foreign matter</title>
<description>
<comment>
<dated-link date="2002-07-12"
>User control of collation, foreign matter</dated-link>
<para>Thank you for specifying that "[S] [I] Software that allows users to
sort or search text SHOULD allow the user to select alternative rules
for collation units and ordering." I am glad to see that you are not
requiring that software use the collation rules of the user's language
whether the user wants it to or not.
The requirement "[S] [I] When sorting and searching in the context of
a particular language, it MUST be possible to deal gracefully with
strings being compared that contain Unicode characters not normally
associated with that language" appears to be unenforceably vague: the
word "gracefully" seems impossible to define sharply enough to allow
objective determinations of whether a given spec or implementation
conforms with this requirement or not. I would be loath to lose
the word "gracefully" from the text, but I don't believe it belongs in
a conformance requirement.</para>
</comment>
</description>
</lc-comment>
Received on Thursday, 11 July 2002 21:40:44 UTC