- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 16:54:39 +0000
- To: www-i18n-comments@w3.org
On 08/02/2001 16:27:07 Richard, Francois M wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:41 AM
> To: Richard, Francois M
> Subject: RE: grammatical question
>
>
> 1. I think so.
> 2. no
>
> How about:
> If a specification uses the Reference Processing Model, this does not
> require that implementations actually use Unicode.
>
> A specification can use the Reference Processing Model; this does not
> require that implementations actually use Unicode.
>
> A specification can use the Reference Processing Model without
> implementations actually having to use Unicode.
>
> A specification using the Reference Processing Model does not necessarily
> imply that implementations must use Unicode.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard, Francois M
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 10:14 AM
> To: Nakada, Joyce
> Subject: grammatical question
>
>
>
> Is this sentence:
>
> 1- correct
>
> 2- clear
>
> ?
>
> "For a specification to use the Reference Processing Model does not require
> that implementations actually use Unicode. "
>
>
>
> - att1.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2001 11:58:07 UTC