Re: New <AREA> syntax proposal

To: J-F Pitot de La Beaujardiere <delabeau@iniki.gsfc.nasa.gov>, colin@bespin.demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: New <AREA> syntax proposal
From: Jordan Reiter <jordanreiter@techie.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 11:07:46 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: www-html@w3.org
From www-html-request@www10.w3.org Tue Jun 10 11: 08:55 1997
Message-Id: <199706101507.LAA00184@ren.globecomm.net>
X-List-URL: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Forums#www-html
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.2
X-See-Also: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/

At 10:33 AM 6/10/97 -0400, Jeff de la Beaujardiere wrote:
>
>Colin F Reynolds writes:
>> Don't most area maps use four colo(u)rs, that being the maximum number of
>> colors required to assure that no two adjacent regions bear the same
>> color?
>
>Four is the *minimum*, which is probably what you meant to write.
Are you sure?  I mean, what about a map shaped like:

----------------------------
|            |             |
|            |             |
|            |             |
|            |             |
|            |-------------|
|            |             |
|            |             |
|            |             |
|            |             |
----------------------------

Or do maps only count if they have at least four pieces...;-)

Follow-Ups:

Re: New <AREA> syntax proposal

From: w3-html-list@faerber.muc.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?=)

Prev: Re: New <AREA> syntax proposal
Next: No Subject
Index: Message index of www-html@w3.org mailing list
Thread: Thread index of www-html@w3.org mailing list