On 15.01.2011 16:03, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > HTML5 has "up" as a link relationship, but nothing for the opposite > direction. I'd been using rev="up" for this, but since @rev has been > removed from HTML5 I'd like to specify an inverse relationship to use. > Would the obvious name, "down", be most sensible, or something like > "sub", or some other proposal? Has this been discussed before? I don't think it has been discussed. Probably because it's not entirely clear what it would be good for -- in many cases, there'd by many many "down" links. > Should a "down" link relationship conform to the same repetition > semantics as "up"? I'd wait for the resolution of <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/119>. > My use case is for archived pages whose contents I can't modify > without of course making them non archived content. I want to link to > ancient pages and mark them up as being sub-pages of the page that > discusses them. Hm. Maybe this deserves a more specific relation? Additional pointers: Web Linking spec: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5988> IANA registry: <http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml> IANA registry related info: <http://paramsr.us/link-relation-types/> Best regards, JulianReceived on Saturday, 15 January 2011 15:34:15 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:18 GMT