W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > February 2009

Re: XHTML MIME Types note

From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:38:53 +0100
To: "David Dorward" <david@dorward.me.uk>, www-html@w3.org
Cc: "XHTML WG" <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uot223hosmjzpq@acer3010.wlan.cwi.nl>

Hello David,

Thanks for your comments.

On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:45:30 +0100, David Dorward <david@dorward.me.uk>  
wrote:
> I see the new version of http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/ has
> been published.
>
> Unfortunately, due to being caught up with various minor crises, I
> didn't find time to raise formal comments on some of the things in the
> latest version before it got out of draft.
>
> So, informally then - could someone explain how the content of iframe
> elements is considered different in HTML and XHTML documents? It must be
> pretty significant since the content of the element is the only way to
> provide alternative content for user agents which don't support or have
> frames disabled.
>
> On the same note - how does having JavaScript turned off change the way
> the content of the element is evaluated?

These additions were suggested by Simon Pieters of Opera.

His message that explains them is here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2008Oct/0027

I hope this helps.

Best wishes,

Steven Pemberton
For the XHTML WG
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 15:39:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:15 GMT