- From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:59:00 +0100 (CET)
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- cc: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>, www-html@w3.org
On 17 Nov, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> A monolithic specification is less likely to be read. A shorter, to the
>> point, specification benefit content and site creators alike.
>
> That's why we're writing an authoring guide.
It'd be better if you wrote distinct, clean, specifications which
separated one thing from another.
This has been suggested to you several times, and there has not so far
been given any good reason why it shouldn't be done.
--
- Tina Holmboe siteSifter Greytower Technologies
http://www.sitesifter.co.uk http://www.greytower.net
Website Quality and Accessibility Testing
Received on Tuesday, 18 November 2008 00:09:56 UTC