W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > August 2008

Re: Alternate version

From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:45:20 +0100
Message-ID: <48975C50.20303@david-woolley.me.uk>
To: qmpeople <info@qmpeople.com>
CC: www-html@w3.org

qmpeople wrote:
> 
> - can I write:
>  <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr" type="text/html" 
> href="http://www.qmpeople.fr/"> ?

I'm not clear what error or ambiguity in the HTML specification you are 
trying to point out here.

> 
> - can I write:
>  <link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr" type="text/html" 
> href="http://fr.qmpeople.com/">
>  with a 301 redirect from http://fr.qmpeople.com 

 From an HTML point of view, this is no different from the previous 
example.  IETF deals with HTTP standardisation.  However, it might be 
worth pointing out getting a 301 redirect should be interpreted as 
meaning you need to correct the URL, so one shouldn't deliberately 
design to create such redirects.  Also, one might want to consider 
content negotiation.

> <http://fr.qmpeople.com/> to http://www.qmpeople.fr 
> <http://www.qmpeople.fr/> ?
> 


-- 
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Monday, 4 August 2008 19:44:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:14 GMT