I mentioned this earlier in one of my comments about expanding the set of allowable datetime strings to include some addition strings allowed under ISO 8601, but this is sufficiently different I wished to make certain that those who had tuned out from the earlier discussion were aware of this concern by repeating it in a separate thread. At present the HTML 5 draft version extends the allowed syntax of the datetime value from that used in HTML 4 / XHTML 1 to include strings that are not valid ISO 8601 specifiers. Specifically, it breaks syntax allowed by ISO 8601 by allowing optional whitespace. I can to some degree see the value of allowing whitespace where the textContent of the <time> element is being parsed instead of the datetime attribute. However, for the attribute itself, unless an existing implementation is accepting extra whitespace when parsing the datetime attribute of <ins> and <del> in HTML 4, I can't see the value in accepting whitespace for the attributes. Ernest ClineReceived on Sunday, 27 April 2008 23:20:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:36 GMT