- From: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:53:58 +0100
- To: Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com>
- CC: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>, www-html@w3.org
Ernest -- > What gets lost in the current quixotic quest > for the semantic web, is that at first HTML > wasn't all that semantic. OL and UL were > but two flavors of list markup along with > MENU and DIR that were concerned far more > with the appearance than the semantics of > the markup. What is your evidence for this statement ? What leads you to believe that appearance, rather than semantics, were the intended purpose of <OL> and <UL> Philip TAYLOR
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 06:54:26 UTC