On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 03:33:14PM +1000, Lachlan Hunt wrote: > >Or have someone officially redefined HTML as a presentational language > >while I was looking the other way? > > No, but we have to strike an appropriate balance between a strict > separation of presentation and semantics, and having a set of useful and > practical elements. So HTML 5 should, as opposed to HTML 4, become a *mix* of a presentational and structural language? Frankly, I wish you'd try to see the other side of this debate, Lachlan. I have, since 1995, taught people that HTML is a *structural* language and we are gaining ground. Slowly, perhaps, but we are getting there, and as others have pointed out: it is /improving/* accessibility. HTML 5 is going to turn that upside down - and, yes, I do admit that I am slightly bitter that twelve years of trying to impart something of structure, semantics, and accessibility is going to be tossed down the drain for the sake of, frankly, misguided 'pragmatism'. * Sorry. You'll all just have to learn to live with all the presentational markup in my e-mails. Alternatively you could have the courtesy of not putting IRC logs online when spending time dissing opponents. -- - Tina Holmboe Developer's Archive Greytower Technologies http://www.dev-archive.net http://www.greytower.netReceived on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 16:01:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:37 GMT