- From: Philip Taylor (Webmaster) <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:52:30 +0100
- CC: public-html@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
Henrik Lied wrote: > I'm sorry, I must have formulated my sentences poorly. Of course, > everyone is entitled to their own opinion. No doubt about that. > All I'm saying is that the number of suggestions that come in are > overwhelming, and (IMO) that's literally making the development > slow. It's a great idea to develop this spec as a community, but > it has (again, IMO) grown out of reasonable proportions. I agree, which is why I earlier proposed "Moving on" that we take a formal vote on some of the more fundemental issues. If we could clarify how the community is split over those, I do think it would help. > This is where I'm in quite of a puzzle. The design philosophy behind > this charter is (should, at least) be well known. In my opinion, when > suggestions like implementing the INDENT element, as well as suggesting > that DIV should be allowed inside every other element, I get a vibe that > the person(s) responsible for those suggestion(s) haven't really > read/understood > that specific philosophy. > Again, in my opinion this does nothing but slow the development down. Yes, again I agree : if someone doesn't actually understand HTML (from the strict syntax perspective) and proposes ideas that are completely crazy, then those ideas need to be ditched immediately. There may even be a case for arguing that "invited expert" status should be withdrawn if a contributor demonstrates a total lack of any relevant expertise. Thus I suspect we might well agree, but my way of expressing it is different to yours ! ** Phil.
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 11:52:34 UTC