W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > May 2007

Re: Cleaning House

From: Tina Holmboe <tina@greytower.net>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 22:39:22 +0200 (CEST)
To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Philip & Le Khanh <Philip-and-LeKhanh@royal-tunbridge-wells.org>, www-html@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <tkrat.d5a74ee64bec8538@greytower.net>

On  6 May, Jim Jewett wrote:

> If the parsing fallbacks were dropped, and b were defined strictly as
> a fallback for strong -- it would continue to be prescriptively wrong,
> but it would still produce something that many people would see as a
> synonym for header, just as they do in printed pages.

  How do you read it out loud?

  Doing it wrong in a different way doesn't mean that either way of
  doing it wrong is a good idea.

  Please - and it goes for all of us - try to keep in mind that
  "graphical rendering of a page" is not the only physical reality in
  which a webpage and its content is supposed to exist.

-- 
 -       Tina Holmboe                           Greytower Technologies
       tina@greytower.net                      http://www.greytower.net
        +46 708 557 905
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2007 20:39:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:10 GMT