Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> Without /apparent/ such, anyhow, since the WHATWG, oddly >> enough for a group that consist of browser vendors, appear >> not to read "wild" HTML ... > > See large-scale study of HTML in the wild cited above (although I'd love > to see a version that is even more quantitative and links to some > samples, or better yet a fully reproducible experiment.) So would I. Maybe it should be a priority for the new WG to put together an open methodology and do just that. http://triin.net/2006/06/12/Coding_practices_of_web_pages seems to be a start. -- Benjamin Hawkes-LewisReceived on Sunday, 6 May 2007 13:00:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:43 GMT