Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >Also, as was already hinted at in this thread, it's unlikely that >mainstream browsers will actually implement the draconian parsing...and >that's fine by me, I wouldn't insist on something like the >"non-well-formed XHTML sent as application/xhtml+xml" error handling. Not sure what you mean. I would insist, if the XHTML were identified with an XML mime type, that it require XML well-formedness. If I had wanted to "support XHTML" by just piping "application/xml+xhtml" content through our tag-soup parser, I would have done that in IE7. :)Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:09:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:43 GMT