- From: Chris Wilson <Chris.Wilson@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2007 12:09:40 -0700
- To: "Patrick H. Lauke" <redux@splintered.co.uk>, "www-html@w3.org" <www-html@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Patrick H. Lauke wrote: >Also, as was already hinted at in this thread, it's unlikely that >mainstream browsers will actually implement the draconian parsing...and >that's fine by me, I wouldn't insist on something like the >"non-well-formed XHTML sent as application/xhtml+xml" error handling. Not sure what you mean. I would insist, if the XHTML were identified with an XML mime type, that it require XML well-formedness. If I had wanted to "support XHTML" by just piping "application/xml+xhtml" content through our tag-soup parser, I would have done that in IE7. :)
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2007 19:09:47 UTC