Lachlan Hunt wrote: > This seems to be the source of contention in the current debate. For > the spec to be implementable, it needs to define conformance > requirements for UAs, including error handling and how to handle both > existing and future content. Perhaps if those implementation conformance constraints were defined in a separate specification, it would help to clearly divide the issue? In the case of XHTML 2 the plan was always to have an implementors guide that went along with it to provide the sort of information I think you are talking about; but without confusing the authoring community with a lot of data that, frankly, is very domain specific. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.comReceived on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 18:03:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:43 GMT