Philip & Le Khanh wrote: > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> The WG is having a formal survey about adopting WHATWG HTML5 as >> the*starting point*. >> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/htmlbg/results Quoting the >> announcement by Dan Connolly: "A 'no' vote in this survey isa >> formal objection. An individual who registers a Formal >> Objectionshould cite technical arguments and propose changes that >> would removethe Formal Objection." > > [...] You do not have the option of saying simply "No, I think that > WHATWG HTML5 is fundamentally flawed and is totally unsuitable as a > starting point". You can state that if you wish, but you have to back up your claim with an explanation of *why* it is fundamentally flawed. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/Received on Tuesday, 1 May 2007 12:37:10 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:43 GMT