W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > March 2007

Re: abbr and acronym

From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 00:09:12 +0000
Message-ID: <4605BDA8.40501@splintered.co.uk>
To: www-html@w3.org

David Woolley wrote:

> The reason that it is a special subset of abbreviation is that it requires
> special handling in text to speech applications.

Yes, but should this be handled by a new element, or just a refinement 
(additional attribute, for instance) of the abbr element? Or should it 
be left up to the AT, or something like css3's speech module?

P
-- 
Patrick H. Lauke
______________________________________________________________
re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively
[latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.]
www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk
http://redux.deviantart.com
______________________________________________________________
Co-lead, Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force
http://webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Take it to the streets ... join the WaSP Street Team
http://streetteam.webstandards.org/
______________________________________________________________
Received on Sunday, 25 March 2007 00:09:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 March 2012 18:16:08 GMT