> There's nothing that prevents you from saying the content model of > title is limited to: > > sup, sub, em, strong, span, abbr (others I'm forgetting). Right, and that's basically what is proposed [1] (albeit not with a "comprehensive" content model yet). I understand that there's basic consensus on this issue, but the question is if that problem/inconsistency could be addressed in any future (X)HTML spec? (By the way, this somewhat tempts me to cross-post all the time.) [1] http://meiert.com/en/blog/20070226/html-semantics-of-title-element-content/ -- Jens Meiert http://meiert.com/en/Received on Thursday, 1 March 2007 15:16:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:49:42 GMT