W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > July 2007

Re: Formal Recorded Complaint

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:21:39 -0400
Message-ID: <46AE2C33.2060708@us.ibm.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>, steve@w3.org, timbl@w3.org, jbrewer@w3.org, "'wai-ig list'" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, wai-xtech@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, www-html@w3.org

Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 14:30 -0700, John Foliot wrote:
>> Mr. Bratt, Mr. Berners-Lee, Ms. Brewer, Mr. Connolly,
>> I am writing today regarding an issue that both shocks and profoundly
>> disappoints me.  While I understand that to a large extent there is little
>> that can be done at this point, I personally feel that the issue I am
>> referring to should be brought directly to your attention, as it indirectly
>> affects the reputation and public position of the W3C.
> [...]
> John, your complaint is acknowledged.
> Yes, accessibility is essential part of our charter...
>   http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html#coordination
> ... but figuring out how to achieve it is hard work.
> Organizing the W3C HTML WG as primarily a large mailing list is
> somewhat risky; typically, W3C Working Groups establish mutual
> trust and respect in face-to-face meetings and teleconferences
> which results in more sensitivity than we are seeing in
> the HTML WG mailing list and nearby forums such as IRC.
> (The particular discussion you cite is in a WHATWG forum,
> not a W3C forum, but I think that matters only a little.)

Other standards organizations cope, and do so by having policies for 
dealing with situations such as these.  For example:


I submit that if the W3C is not willing to establish and enforce similar 
policies that this noble experiment is openness may not produce the 
results you seek.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 30 July 2007 18:40:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:16 UTC