- From: Patrick H. Lauke <redux@splintered.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:21:12 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
John M. Black wrote: > In principle I > might argue that the "strength" of a particular element is not > something that should be defined in html attributes at all. However, I'd argue that the "strength" in this case influences the meaning/content, hence should be part of the document's markup, and not rely on styling alone. It would also be a lot more elegant than requiring nesting to achieve positive increments, and gives an interesting way out for removing <small> (presentational) without the need to reinvent another element for this purpose. P -- Patrick H. Lauke __________________________________________________________ re·dux (adj.): brought back; returned. used postpositively [latin : re-, re- + dux, leader; see duke.] www.splintered.co.uk | www.photographia.co.uk http://redux.deviantart.com __________________________________________________________ Web Standards Project (WaSP) Accessibility Task Force http://webstandards.org/ __________________________________________________________
Received on Monday, 22 January 2007 00:21:33 UTC