On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 02:56:08PM +0000, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > the last line of which suggests that they are, in fact, serving > HTML. The document itself (see below) claims to be XHTML 1.0, > but reinforces the apparent wish to be parsed as HTML by replicating > the "Content-type" in the META element at line 4. Blame Appendix C, I gather it caused the Validator team no end of bother trying to handle the switching between XML mode and SGML mode in OpenSP. I gather the authors of XHTML 1.0 didn't expect it to be around for very long, but that was 7 years ago and we're still suffering from the new form of tag soup its introduced :( -- David Dorward http://dorward.me.ukReceived on Wednesday, 10 January 2007 16:24:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 July 2008 07:54:34 GMT