Henri Sivonen wrote: > > On Feb 27, 2007, at 13:44, Jukka K. Korpela wrote: >> They are already completely incompatible, except in the trickery sense >> that you can masquerade XHTML 1.0 so that it will be eaten by existing >> browsers as the tag soup HTML that they can process. > > I think he meant the serializability of conforming XHTML document trees > as HTML. Whereas I think he meant the serving of XHTML 1.0 as HTML, yet requiring browsers to /ignore/ the HTML semantics of (e.g.) <META ... /> and to continue parsing further content as HEAD matter, even though the "/>" has terminated the HEAD region. Philip TaylorReceived on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 14:43:20 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:33 GMT