Le 26 sept. 06 à 15:50, Orion Adrian a écrit : > It was my understanding that @role was supposed to accept QNames. +1, > -2 don't seem like QNames to me. As stated earlier, I don't understand role very well. the idea is to set a value to an attribute of the em element instead of having several element that basically do the same thing with a minor variation. From what I read, role is not the right attribute; What would you suggest? -- </david_latapie> http://blog.empyree.org/ U+0F00Received on Tuesday, 26 September 2006 14:46:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 6 April 2009 12:59:32 GMT