[Moderator Action] Re: [XHTML 2.0] Only one emphasis tag

Le 25 sept. 06 à 15:00, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :

> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:54:30 +0200, David Latapie <david@empyree.org>  
> wrote:
>> -- <em role="0">    default
>> -- <em role="+1">   equivalent to em
>> -- <em role="+2">   equivalent to strong
>> -- <em role="-1">   less important, may be rendered as font-size:smaller
>
> This proposal doesn't cover nesting.

Do you mean emphasis inside an emphasis? I suggest *addition*

“Animals (for instance dogs, like _mine_) do it”


XHTML 2.0         “Animals (<em role="-1">for instance dogs, like <em
role="+1">mine</em>)</em> do it”
                        0
-1                                    +1=0                 0
CSS voice-stress |--none-|-------------
reduced------------------|---------none-----------|-----none---|

(there may also be a final gap at the end of de-emphasis, but this is
not related to nesting, this is just an extra thought)

Please tell me if answsers shall not be forwarded to editor, only
initial proposals.

-- 
</david_latapie>
http://blog.empyree.org/   U+0F00

Received on Monday, 25 September 2006 13:36:59 UTC