W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-html@w3.org > November 2006

Defining processing of invalid documents (Was: Charters for review (TAG issue tagSoupIntegration-54))

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:22:24 -0800
Message-ID: <403d38e20611211422i54f4c03fv737628bc1310acbc@mail.gmail.com>
To: ed.rice@hp.com, www-html@w3.org

(Thread moved to www-html@w3.org at danc's request.)

Ed Rice <ed.rice@hp.com> wrote, on w3c-html-cg@w3.org:
> Doesn't including the non-well-formed/invalid documents in the
> architecture/design actually validate the design and say that there is
> no such thing as a non-well-formed document?

No; you can simultaneously say that something is invalid and say exactly
how it should be processed. CSS does this; for instance:

    p { color: "red"; color: green; }

...is completely invalid CSS (you can't pass a string to the property
'color'), but every conforming UA will handle it the same.

In the case of HTML5, the HTML5 parser spec:


...defines what is an error (non-conforming syntax) and what isn't.

Ian Hickson
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2006 22:22:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:06:14 UTC